Skip to content Skip to navigation

NGO Joint Open letter to the UN Secretary-General on the state of the treaty body system


[PDF version]

Dear Secretary-General,

In advance of the preparation of your upcoming second biennial report on “the status of the human rights treaty body system and the progress achieved by the UN human rights treaty bodies in realizing greater efficiency and effectiveness in their work” as set out in General Assembly resolution 68/268 (para.40), the undersigned nongovernmental organizations wish to draw your attention to a series of objectives, principles and recommendations that we consider essential in any efforts to strengthen the human rights treaty bodies.

These are relevant for the preparation of the 2018 progress report as well as for the political process associated with the review of the measures taken and their sustainability, which should take place no later than 2020 (para. 41). In the first place, we recommend that your report encourage a process that is participatory and a final outcome that promotes a strong, independent and effective treaty body system.

We therefore respectfully suggest that your report call on Member States to ensure:

  • That any upcoming review process, independently of its leadership, is carried out through an open and transparent process that allows for direct non-State participation and that takes into account contributions by civil society, treaty body members, OHCHR, academics, practitioners and any other relevant stakeholders.
  • A clear and strong commitment to give due attention to the needs and perspectives of rights-holders and victims.
  • That any further initiatives for treaty body strengthening adhere to key principles and objectives, including by:

Providing the treaty bodies with sufficient regular funding and resources to carry out their functions and to comprehensively assess States parties’ compliance with their treaty obligations.

Respecting the independence of the treaty bodies and their competence to establish their own working methods, including with respect to their engagement with stakeholders and the sources of information on which they rely.

Ensuring regular periodicity of State party reviews through compliance with reporting obligations.

Enhancing the accessibility of the treaty bodies and the participation of rights holders and victims of human rights violations in the work of the treaty bodies including by making the system better known at the national level.

Taking effective measures to prevent and combat intimidation and reprisals against those seeking to cooperate with the treaty bodies.

Ensuring adequate follow-up on and implementation of the recommendations and views of the treaty bodies.

Ensuring expertise, independence and diversity in the treaty body membership by promoting open, transparent and merit-based nomination processes at the national level and by voting only for candidates that fulfill the criteria set out in the respective treaties and resolution 68/268 (para. 10 and 13).

The undersigned hope that a political process that could weaken the treaty bodies can be avoided. We encourage you and the High Commissioner for Human Rights to play a leadership role in protecting the independence and impartiality of the treaty body system and in promoting measures that will genuinely strengthen the treaty bodies, including through participatory processes.

While recognizing that the treaty bodies have made some progress towards alignment of working methods to date[1], we are of the view that, subject to the specificity of the different treaties, greater usability and efficiency could still be achieved if all of the treaty bodies had more similar processes and practices. We would however like to underline that the objective should be to align with best practices, and improve the impact of the treaty bodies, rather than steering towards a lowest common denominator.

We look forward to continuing to engage with you, the treaty bodies, individually and through the meetings of the Chairs and their Secretariats, to encourage measures to strengthen their effectiveness and the protection of rightsholders, including their facilitated access to the treaty body system. We stand ready to provide further inputs on substantive measures that could accomplish these goals.

We thank you in advance for your commitment to the protection of human rights, including through the human rights treaty bodies.


Yours sincerely,

  • Advocates for Human Rights
  • Alkarama Foundation
  • American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
  • Amnesty International
  • Association for the Prevention of Torture
  • Center for Constitutional Rights
  • Center for Legal and Social Studies (CELS)
  • Center for Reproductive Rights
  • Centre for Civil and Political Rights
  • CIVICUS World Alliance for Citizen Participation
  • Columbia Law School Human Rights Institute
  • Forum Asia
  • Global Detention Project
  • Human Rights in China (HRIC)
  • Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights
  • International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)
  • International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
  • International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA)
  • International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT)
  • International Service for Human Rights (ISHR)
  • Litigio estratégico en derechos humanos, A.C (I(dh)eas)
  • Open Society Justice Initiative
  • TB-Net :
    • Child Rights Connect
    • Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
    • International Movement Against All Forms of Discrimination and Racism (IMADR)
    • International Women's Rights Action Watch (IWRAW)
    • World Organization against Torture (OMCT)
  • Trial International
  • Validity Foundation – Mental Disability Advocacy Centre
  • Women´s Link Worldwide

[1] See also NGO submission to the 29th Annual Meeting of Chairpersons of Human Rights Treaty Bodies, available at


709事件 公众知情权 司法公正 行政拘留 法律天地 任意羁押
公示财产 双边对话 黑监狱 书评 商业与人权 审查
零八宪章 儿童 中国法 翻墙技术 公民行动 公民记者
公民参与 民间社会 评论 中国共产党 宪法 消费者安全
思想争鸣 腐败 反恐 向强权说“不!” 文革 文化之角
时政述评 网络安全 社会民生 民主和政治改革 拆迁 异议人士
教育 选举 被迫失踪 环境 少数民族 欧盟-中国
计划生育 农民 结社自由 言论自由 新闻自由 信仰自由
政府问责 政策法规 施政透明 香港 软禁 中国人权翻译
户口 人权理事会 人权动态 非法搜查和拘留 煽动颠覆国家政权 信息控制
信息技术 信息、通信、技术 公民权利和政治权利国际公约 国际人权 国际窗口 国际关系
互联网 互联网治理 建三江律师维权 司法改革 六四 绑架
劳改场 劳工权利 土地、财产、房屋 律师权责 律师 法律制度
国内来信 重大事件(环境污染、食品安全、事故等) 毛泽东 微博 全国人大 新公民运动
非政府组织 奥运 一国两制 网上行动 政府信息公开 人物
警察暴行 司法评述 政治犯 政治 良心犯 历史钩沉
宣传 抗议和请愿 公开呼吁 公共安全 种族歧视 劳动教养
维权人士 维权 法治 上海合作组织 特别专题 国际赔偿
国家秘密 国家安全 颠覆国家政权 监控 科技 思想理论
天安门母亲 西藏 酷刑 典型案例 联合国 美中
维吾尔族人 弱势群体 妇女 青年 青年视野